Zeissimages | Latest photos with comments

Zeissimages Gallery

Most recent comments.
Click on the thumbnail to view all comments. See an image you like, click on the Share and share it.

Photo by paky   •  Last comment by paky   •   On 06-03-10 12:06
I shot this not too long ago when I visited SF. It is a stitched image shot with ZA 16-80 f/3.5-4.5
Photo by ajayc   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-03-10 11:17
Beautiful colors and light. I want to see more. :)
Photo by poyin   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-03-10 10:20
Wow. Scary looking. Great shot especially the sun breaking through the smog.
Photo by pentaxpete   •  Last comment by pentaxpete   •   On 06-03-10 08:48
taken at the annual Dickens Festival, Rochester, Kent,England on a camera club trip. I t was overcast light-- I used a weak flash from a Cobra unit. Film was outdated Ilford XP2400 home-processed in C41.Toned in PhotoShop 7 -- only half the negative used as I did not 'fill the frame' !
Photo by pentaxpete   •  Last comment by pentaxpete   •   On 06-03-10 08:43
My lens the 180mm f4 CFi Sonnar was not in the list of lenses for some reason. This is from an outdated Fuji Provia 100 slide film taken on a Camera Club outing.
Photo by mstudios   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-03-10 08:20
Lovely texture. You can almost feel the surfaces of the walls. Great detail and tones.
Photo by bajanexile   •  Last comment by andreasresch   •   On 06-03-10 07:51
Wonderful contrast and colors. This lens is the subject of many of my dreams.
Photo by mstudios   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-03-10 07:30
Great picture and composition. That is one lonely bird :)
Photo by andreasresch   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-03-10 07:22
Gorgeous! Great shot. This looks like Ramona Falls in Mt Hood Oregon. [url]http://www.nwhiker.com/MHNFHike18.html
Photo by xibalban   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-02-10 21:55
Very nice. Great variation in tones.
Photo by gnatsum   •  Last comment by gnatsum   •   On 06-02-10 21:12
Zeiss man: One day I will have spare cash to afford a luxury like the 135 f1.8. I always find my 70-200 at 135mm. Stephen: Thank you!
Photo by gnatsum   •  Last comment by gnatsum   •   On 06-02-10 21:11
Just messing around with some flowers at home. Here we have the lovely 24-70 f2.8... The lens shows a lot of detail still at f16, though I think I would have a much sharper image had I shot at f8. I just needed more depth of field though... For reference, the opened rose on the left is pink in real life, and the more closed rose on the right is yellow. EDIT: also just realised at 70mm this lens needs a focus correction or -5 on the a900 - Chris
Photo by JT   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-02-10 20:02
Long scale model AIII Steinway Heirloom collection :)
Photo by nfive   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-02-10 12:54
I like this shot. I like the stand alone guy, the garbage on the floor, the B&W. It all comes together well. I did crop it with my window to eliminate the lady to the right and it seems usable that way as well.
Photo by mikepeters   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-02-10 11:56
I updated the EXIF to reflect the camera :)
Photo by rick perry   •  Last comment by merrill   •   On 06-02-10 11:40
I like this a lot, Rick, though I'd like to see how it looks with the poster removed. Merrill
Photo by jhsymington   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-02-10 09:14
I added this lens to the database.
Photo by lazzaros   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-02-10 08:32
Have you thought about getting a ZE version? It would record all data. Anyway, when will you post some more from this series and the other. Great work. Las fotos y las modelos son maravillosa. Tengo que visitar Espana y Portugal.
Photo by jhsymington   •  Last comment by JT   •   On 06-02-10 08:20
Dreamy looking. Love it.
Photo by nksyoon   •  Last comment by jeffrey_c   •   On 06-02-10 06:14
Nice shot.. love it!
Photo by pentaxpete   •  Last comment by pentaxpete   •   On 06-02-10 05:34
Rolleiflex 2.8 F Planar (about 1962),outdated Ilford XP2 Super home-processed in C41, toned in PhotoShop 7
Photo by pentaxpete   •  Last comment by pentaxpete   •   On 06-02-10 05:32
Rolleiflex 2.8F Planar ( about 1962), outdated Ilford XP2 Super home-processed in C41, toned in PhotoShop7
Photo by pentaxpete   •  Last comment by pentaxpete   •   On 06-02-10 05:30
Rolleiflex 2.8F Planar (about 1962), outdated Ilford XP2 Super home-processed in C41, toned in PhotoShop 7.
Photo by pentaxpete   •  Last comment by pentaxpete   •   On 06-02-10 05:27
Rolleiflex 2.8F Planar (about 1962) Ilford XP2 Super outdated 2007 home-processed in C41 sepia toned in PhotoShop 7
Photo by philber   •  Last comment by bajanexile   •   On 06-02-10 02:02
I agree with Zeiss Man, re: this set of Venice. Stephen