Raw comments

Photo ID 501099
05-29-10
JT
Great capture. Did you use a polarizer on this one?
Photo ID 501086
05-29-10
JT
Very nice. You can probably tell by now that I have a thing for B&W :)
Photo ID 501082
05-29-10
JT
Striking! Incredible B&W tones not to mention the crispness of detail. How did you convert to B&W?
Photo ID 501078
05-29-10
JT
Beautiful. So serene and peaceful. Great lighting, colors and detail.
Photo ID 501071
05-29-10
JT
This looks like it belongs in National geographics.
Photo ID 501060
05-29-10
bajanexile
This was shot down on the Old Bristol Docks. It is a favourite haunt of mine. Next time you are over here, get in touch and we can shoot a few frames together. Bath is just down the road as well. Stephen
Photo ID 501061
05-29-10
bajanexile
No offence taken. This is what a website like this should be all about, At least you are prepared to offer feedback. As a commission, I would have hired a lift/hoist and shot the image ~ 50 ft up. Not possible as an amateur. Best regards Stephen
Photo ID 501060
05-29-10
philber
Very moody, in a nice way! Where was this shot?
Photo ID 501061
05-29-10
philber
Stephen, sorry if my comment comes out negative, it is intended with a friendly and constructive intent. I feel that this picture is seriously over-corrected. Perspective is straight but does not look natural. The ground, for example looks distorted rather than horizontal. My guess is that some kind of compromise between the two images would be best. After all, it has to look "right" rather than "straight". Still, an interesting and enlightening exercise, and a nice shot!
Photo ID 501071
05-29-10
philber
Great capture!
Photo ID 501071
05-29-10
merrill
Taken with a Contax RTS II in 1985
Photo ID 500559
05-29-10
bajanexile
Like this composition. Stephen
Photo ID 501051
05-29-10
magiclight
Yes, we are getting plenty of rain over here in Dunedin, NZ. We are currenly on flood alert with rivers breaking their banks. Where I took the waterfall image the annual rainfall is around 8000mm.
Photo ID 501051
05-28-10
JT
It reminds me of Mt Rainier National Park here in the Pacific Northwest. I Think it's time to get out and take pictures but it has not stopped raining since last year :)
Photo ID 501062
05-28-10
philber
Nice spooky quality. I like it!
Photo ID 501055
05-28-10
lolphoto
This is really cool!
Photo ID 501061
05-28-10
bajanexile
Thanks for looking and commenting Zeiss Man and Rick. Rick, this image was corrected in DxO Optics Pro 6 ELITE software using their excellent Geometry Tools. You have to shoot the frame(s) with sufficient margin around the subject if you plan to make these corrections as you can loose a significant % of the frame in the process, not a problem with the 5d Mk.II as the 21 Megapixel sensor allows a high degree of "cropability" without loss of IQ. The Mk.I was more of a problem. Stephen
Photo ID 501051
05-28-10
magiclight
South Westland, New Zealand Cheers Dave
Photo ID 501061
05-28-10
rick perry
I must say I like this version best - how did you correct it?
Photo ID 501057
05-28-10
mikepeters
Thanks! Good to be here.
Photo ID 501061
05-28-10
JT
This version definitely looks better. [u]HOWEVER[/u] the original version give it a sense of grandeur as the it leads you up to the heavens.
Photo ID 501057
05-28-10
alvaro
Nice to see your work in here Mike
Photo ID 500504
05-28-10
JT
Just click on "Click Here to Replace Photo" in the edit options above the main photo and upload a larger version. would love to see it.
Photo ID 501062
05-28-10
alvaro
Taken with a 80 f2.8 Planar F on a Hasselblad 2000fcw.
Photo ID 501063
05-28-10
alvaro
Taken with a 50 f2.8 Distagon F on a Hasselblad 2000fcw.
Photo ID 501061
05-28-10
bajanexile
Anyone have a preference for the Corrected VS. the Non-Corrected image or does it not really matter that much? Stephen
Photo ID 501051
05-28-10
bajanexile
Lovely capture. Best regards Stephen
Photo ID 501059
05-28-10
JT
Is that on the edge of a cliff? Brave cattle :)
Photo ID 501054
05-28-10
mikepeters
Taken with a 50 f2.8 Distagon F on a Hasselblad 2003fcw.
Photo ID 501056
05-28-10
mikepeters
Taken with a 50 f2.8 Distagon F on a Hasselblad 2003fcw.
Photo ID 501058
05-28-10
mikepeters
Taken with a 50 f2.8 Distagon F on a Hasselblad 2003fcw.
Photo ID 501057
05-28-10
mikepeters
Taken with a 110 f2.0 Planar F on a Hasselblad 2003fcw.
Photo ID 501055
05-28-10
mikepeters
Thanks, this was taken with a 110 f2.0 Planar F on a Hasselblad 2003fcw.
Photo ID 501055
05-28-10
JT
Love it :)
Photo ID 501053
05-28-10
bajanexile
This is the image by which the present cathedral is best known and is one of its great glories. The magnificent west façade, built between 1209 and 1250, is 100 feet high and 150 feet wide - exactly twice the width of the Nave which it terminates. There are niches for more than 500 figure sculptures, most of them larger than lifesize. Wells’ west front is unique in retaining almost 300 of its original medieval statues.
Photo ID 501051
05-28-10
JT
Beautiful! Where was this?
Photo ID 501045
05-28-10
bajanexile
Love all the interesting detail in this image Rick. Looks like you have a bit of Vignetting on the top right of the frame? Regards Stephrn
Photo ID 501013
05-28-10
bajanexile
All my images posted to this Website have been taken either with a Canon EOS 5D Mk.I or a Canon EOS 5D Mk.II. with a Zeiss Distagon T 21mm f/2.8 ZE lens. This image was made with the Mk.II. Regards Stephen
Photo ID 501049
05-28-10
bajanexile
More than simply an historic house and garden, this splendid medieval Palace has been the home of the Bishops of Bath and Wells for 800 years. There are 14 acres of gardens including the springs from which the city takes its name. Visitors can also see the Bishop's private Chapel, ruined Great Hall and the Gatehouse with portcullis and drawbridge beside which the famous mute swans ring a bell for food.
Photo ID 501045
05-27-10
rick perry
Owls Head Harbor - Maine - USA - Cropped wide.
Photo ID 501013
05-27-10
solimano
camera?
Photo ID 501021
05-27-10
natebarnz
Great scene!
Photo ID 501038
05-27-10
natebarnz
Great lens indeed. Glad to see some more M42 lenses here!
Photo ID 501026
05-27-10
philber
Stephen, thanks for your interesting comments and suggestions. I tried the B&W, but it just doesn't work for me this time. OTOH, I warmed the white balance, and you are just sooo right. Thanks again.
Photo ID 501026
05-27-10
philber
Stephen, the spires are very tall indeed. Including them fully would have been more "faithful", but would have provided a much smaller and more distant picture, without the profusion and complexity which I wanted to show. Besides, the main spire just wasn't there before the restoration/embellishment of the late XIXth century, when Viollet le Duc believed in not only restoring, but also "improving"...
Photo ID 501039
05-27-10
lulu
Aperture f/2,8. Since this is a manual M42 mount lens it does not give true aperture data in the EXIF file.
Photo ID 501038
05-27-10
lulu
Thank you! I am glad I could draw your attention to this old lens.
Photo ID 501038
05-27-10
JT
Beautiful! I will be adding a bunch of lenses to the list that are not there now including this one.
Photo ID 501037
05-27-10
rick perry
Great shot!
Photo ID 501012
05-27-10
bajanexile
Top shot. One of the best B&W's I have seen on this site to date. Full of interest as far as I am concerned. Regards Stephen