zeissimages.com
Viewing mode:   Light  -  Dark

Forum Home |

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f3.5 Review

avatar
United States nathanwestcott | 2015-12-08 | Viewed 2456 times | Bottom
After I purchased a sony a7, I have had trouble finding a telephoto lens. I wanted something light, relatively small, with great color, contrast, and bokeh. For telephotos, I prefer 135mm. My first telephoto for the the sony system was a contax 100mm f2.8 makro-planar. I found this lens exceptional, but too heavy and not long enough. I then tried 135mm STF, but again the lens was too heavy and frankly too expensive for the amount I shot 135mm.

For my next lens, I wanted something smaller, lighter, and cheaper with a zeiss rendering. I initially looked at the contax 135mm f2.8 which is supposed to be excellent. Instead, I went with the CZJ 135mm for its lighter weight and the 49mm filter size that matches my 55mm Zony. There are 5 versions of this lens. The lens can have a single coating or several different iterations of a multicoating. I have the last version of the carl zeiss jena 135mm given the test version of the T* coating. Below is a website with more information on the different lens subtypes.

http://extreme-macro.co.uk/carlzeissjena-135mm

When I look at a lens, the color and contrast matter more than the sharpness. It has to be able to render great color or the sharpness does not matter to me. In shooting this lens,I found that wide open there is great contrast, sharpness, and bokeh. When the lens is stopped down, the lens retains its excellent bokeh. I also really like the color this lens generates. These shots are SOOC for the most part except some highlight recovery. The top image is at f3.5 and the bottom is f5.6.

Embeded Photo f3.5 by [url=https://www.flickr.com/photos/131312380@N06/]Nathan Westcott[/url], on Flickr

Embeded Photo

Below is another example of the wonderful color and contrast SOOC. This one is shot at f5.6.

Embeded Photo

Reply # 8

avatar
Croatia w0werine | 12-26-15 11:57 PM | Bottom
Looks like a decent lens, however I would avoid shooting it in high contrast situations since it produces a lot of lateral CA. Not sure about sphero chromatism? Haven't tested it for that.

Reply # 7

avatar
United States nathanwestcott | 12-21-15 6:57 AM | Bottom
I believe this is the lens comparison that has the carl zeiss jena lens.

http://forum.mflenses.com/communist-135mm-sonnars-comparison-t33719.html

Reply # 6

avatar
United States visu | 12-19-15 9:46 AM | Bottom
That thread does include Zeiss jena 135mm. It is under "Sonnar vs. Sonnars". search for "CZJ Sonnar MC 3.5/135mm" and you will see comparison shots. cooltouch narrowed down to six lens from the set and CZJ Sonnar MC 3.5/135mm is one of them. The resolution of CZJ on the right edge seems to suffer.

Reply # 5

avatar
United States nathanwestcott | 12-19-15 7:22 AM | Bottom
I believe that thread is referring to the Zeiss Contax 135mm f2.8 sonnar, which is also an excellent lens. It was interesting to read about all the old lenses and how they compared with each other.

Reply # 4

avatar
United States visu | 12-18-15 8:20 PM | Bottom
Excellent review! I once owned one and love its color, bokeh and compactness. Then the aperture got stuck at wide opening and I sold it cheaply. There is an interesting review of 12 135mm lens including Zeiss Jena 135mm at http://forum.mflenses.com/twelve-2-8-135mm-lenses-compared-on-5dmkii-t39463.html

Reply # 3

avatar
United States nathanwestcott | 12-14-15 9:03 AM | Bottom
I used a K&F adaptor from amazon and it was 20 and pretty well made. It was for the M42 mount.

Reply # 2

avatar
United States hoverace | 12-12-15 7:18 PM | Bottom
What a coincidence, I found a Carl Zeiss Jena (Biotar f2/58mm ) a few weeks ago attached to a Contax Zeiss camera for $15. I don't think its as sharp as your 135 at infinity but I think it may be the adapter I'm using. There is the slightest of gaps between the lens and the adapter. Its not as bad as the first adapter but the next step up is Novoflex which I'm not sure I want to spend that kind of money.

John

Reply # 1

avatar
United States nathanwestcott | 12-8-15 2:06 PM | Bottom
In order to test the sharpness at infinity, I used the NYC skyline. Below is the scene I shot at f8.

Embeded Photo

I shot the scene in half stop increments from f3.5 to f8 moving from left to right in two rows. The f stops are f3.5, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.8, and 8. Below are the 100% crops in the center. If you can spot the difference stopping down, you are better than me.

Embeded Photo

Next is the lower right of the image. Here is does not clean up until f5.6.

Embeded Photo

Top right

Embeded Photo

Top Left

Embeded Photo

Mid upper right

Embeded Photo

Mid lower right

Embeded Photo

The sharpness of this lens pretty good over the frame from about f5.6 onwards with maybe a small increase at f8.

For me, the carl zeiss jena represents an excellent compromise between size, color, contrast, bokeh, and cost. It weighs only 450 grams and comes with a built in hood. Its filter size means it integrates with my sony kit pretty easily. It is not sharp over the entire frame at f3.5 but by f5.6 it is pretty sharp all over. I definitely recommend this lens if you are looking for something small and light for your camera system that won't break the bank. You can find versions of this lens for under $100. I paid 130 for mine, but that was because it was in excellent shape and had the most modern coating on the lens. If buying make sure to get the multicoated version. Let me know if you have any questions.

Top of Page

Even a one time donation or subscription can go a long way in helping run the site. Use the donate button of your choice.

Thanks for your support !

Gallery Software by Jorge Torralba

Home - Contact Us - Terms - Gallery by Lens - FAQ - Members - MTF - About - BI - Top - Forums - Contest Rules - Market