- Gallery
- All photos
- All photos
- Hall of fame
- Photos with notes
- 2010 - Contest sponsored by Zeiss
- 2012 - Contest sponsored by Zeiss
- 2013 - Contest sponsored by Zeiss
- 2014 - Contest sponsored by Zeiss
- 2015 - Contest sponsored by Zeiss
- 2016 - Contest sponsored by Zeiss
- 2017 - Contest sponsored by Zeiss
- Architecture
- City of Lights
- Cityscape
- General
- Glamour
- Industrial
- Landscape
- Macro
- Nature
- Non Zeiss
- Nudes
- People - Street
- Pets
- Phase One
- Portraits
- Products - Still
- Uncategorized
- Weddings & Events
- Ask
- Members
- Comments
i) Give the photographer some exposure, rather than uploading then being pushed to obscurity after a few hours to page 2 etc.
ii) It gives the viewer opportunity to admire or critique rather than returning to the site at the end of the day and missing out on photographs relegated to page 2 or 3 etc.
iii) The photographer can stop using this as personal storage and then concentrate on his best work to be showcased without going nuts with uploads.
iv) 5 is simply too much, why would anyone want to post 5 in a row anyway? It's silly, as the work is swallowed up and each individual photo cannot be appreciated or viewed as much as it deserves. I've been guilty of this and have learnt from my mistakes and i am sure others may feel the same.
I mean one can be diplomatic and say "yeah, 5 is fair enough", but I'm being brutally honest and undiplomatic and saying 5 is still too much.
This is my opinion and I'm merely trying to convince the majority who have agreed on 5 to lower the limit.
People can use Flickr and such to showcase their complete work, and this should be reserved for their BEST work and not loads of snaps.
I also think uploads should be moderated and any sub standard stuff not allowed to be uploaded.