12-02-14

leviathor

Thanks for the feedback, Jeroen--I never noticed how much that green patch stuck out before, but it's a pretty intense little anomaly, now.

05-06-11

leviathor

Thank you very much, guys. I've retooled this one a bit, so I'll have to re-up it (is this possible, ZM?).

ZM: The 17-35 is a big, bulky beast of a lens, but they're a huge pleasure to use. I bought mine second hand already converted to EOS mount by Bo-Ming. These would be perfect lenses if it weren't for their resolution degradation ellipse. Not that it is a deal-breaker or anything.

08-16-10

leviathor

Andreas: That's the exact switch I made, and I've only 'regretted' it once--when shooting in Arches National Park in Utah in a snow/hail/rain/thunder/lightning storm. The weather sealed nature of the 17-40 would have been nice, and I wasn't sure that the Zeiss would take the weather so nicely.

08-10-10

leviathor

Thanks, Stephen. As you can imagine, the resolving power of the 17-35 isn't accurately represented here. The more I look at this the more I want to rework it a bit: the DR doesn't seem quite right.

08-06-10

leviathor

Beautiful. The depth is *incredible!* I feel as if I could just walk in to the image.

08-06-10

leviathor

I have to agree with ZM on this one: Superb work!

08-06-10

leviathor

Extraordinary! Pardon the pun, but great flow, and rock-solid composition.

08-01-10

leviathor

Thanks, James!

Shot was taken looking strait up in Jenny Lake Campground in Grand Teton National Park.

08-01-10

leviathor

Thanks ZM!